Police reports have revealed that the number of children being sexually abused online has grown by three-quarters in four years.
However, as politicians are set to scrutinise the draft Online Safety Bill, designed to protect children online, the NSPCC says that the bill falls significantly short of tackling this issue.
Sir Peter Wanless, chief executive of NSPCC, said: “Children should be able to explore the online world safely. But instead we are witnessing a dramatic and hugely troubling growth in the scale of online abuse.
“The government has a once-in-a-generation chance to deliver a robust but proportionate regulatory regime that can truly protect children from horrendous online harms."
The NSPCC’s analysis found that in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Channel Islands:
However, the government’s proposals for the Online Safety Bill has a number of significant weaknesses in its plans to protect children from preventable abuse online, the NSPCC says.
The charity states that the draft legislation must be strengthened in the following ways:
1. Stop grooming and abuse spreading between apps
There must be a duty on tech firms to tackle cross-platform risks. Groomers often target children on social networks, then move across platforms to encrypted messaging and livestreaming sites.
2. Disrupt abuse at the earliest possible stage
The Online Safety Bill currently fails to effectively tackle how abusers use platforms to organise in plain sight and post ‘digital breadcrumbs’ that signpost to child abuse images.
3. Fix major gaps in the child safety duty
Currently, the Bill only covers companies with a ‘significant’ number of children on their apps. This means high-risk sites, such as Telegram and OnlyFans, could be excluded from needing to protect children from harmful content.
4. Holding senior managers accountable
There should be a Named Persons Scheme which makes individuals at tech companies personally liable when they fail to uphold their duty of care.
5. Commit to a statutory user advocate for children
The government must introduce a dedicated user advocacy voice for children, funded by the industry levy.
Sir Peter Wanless said: “As it stands, there are substantive weaknesses in its plans, which cannot be overlooked. The draft bill fails to prevent inherently avoidable abuse or reflect the magnitude and complexity of online risks to children.
“The Bill is at a crucial point in pre-legislative scrutiny, and now is the time for the government to be ambitious to protect children and families from preventable abuse,” he concluded.
Age assessments of unaccompanied asylum-seeking children must be carried out by social workers and draw on a multi-agency approach, the professional association for social workers has warned.
The Nationality and Borders Bill, which lays out a raft of legislative measures to change the processes for migrants and asylum seekers in the UK, is currently in [...]
PAMS assessments have been synonymous with specialist parent assessments for adults with learning disabilities since shortly after the assessment framework was established in 1998.
PAMS stands for ‘Parent Assessment Manual Software’ and since its introduction it has been used by social workers and independent experts to assess parents when there are child protection concerns. The [...]
There has been a rise in the number of cases starting in the family courts as there were 66,357 new cases in April to June 2021, up 14% on the same quarter in 2020, according to Ministry of Justice figures.
The increase was due to rises in most case types: financial remedy (76%), private law [...]