Significant weaknesses remain in the quality of services to children who go missing in Worcestershire children’s services, Ofsted has found.
There are weaknesses in the electronic systems to support managers in the Family Front Door Service which was being focused on within the monitoring assessment by Ofsted and in the consistent focus within assessments and plans on the lived experience of children.
This was the second monitoring visit since the local authority was judged inadequate in November 2016. Inspectors found that the local authority has been working hard to improve services to children since Ofsted inspectors conducted a monitoring visit in May 2017. At that time, inspectors concluded that insufficient progress had been made since services were judged to be inadequate in November 2016.
Many of the actions taken by the local authority are quite recent, and some are too new to have yet had a significant impact on improving services.
However, the local authority has achieved some tangible improvements. The report found:
“The local authority has tackled successfully a significant backlog of work in the FFD that inspectors, who visited in May 2017, found was delaying children being seen and receiving services,” said the report. “Tight oversight of initial decisions about children’s levels of need and the services and further assessments that they may require is resulting in decisions being made more quickly, mostly within 24 hours.”
The local authority has also taken an important step forward to engage health agencies to fulfil their statutory expectation of attending all child protection strategy discussions.
However, the report highlights that work to ensure that children who are at risk as a result of going missing is poor. Despite a recommendation at the time of the inspection to improve management oversight, performance information and practice in this area, performance is declining.
There is no management oversight of missing notifications received by the FFD, the inspectors highlights and as a result, the risks to children who go missing, including children missing overnight, are not adequately assessed.
In July 2017, only 61% of children received a return home interview after going missing, and only 24% received their interview within 72 hours of their return. This means that children’s feedback about the ‘push and pull factors’ that influence their running away is not being consistently collected to help plan to keep them safe in the future.
This is reduced performance compared with that at April 2017, at which time all children received an interview and 68% of these interviews were within 72 hours.
A new template for recording home visits to children is supporting social workers to focus on the voice of the child and to improve their analysis, but this development is too recent to have had a significant impact, the report concluded.
New Deprivation of Liberty court launch for children
A National Deprivation of Liberty Court dealing specifically with applications relating to deprive children of their liberty has been announced by Sir Andrew McFarlane, president of the family division.
The court will deal with applications seeking authorisation to deprive children of their liberty and will be based at the Royal Courts of Justice under the [...]
Independent review into CSE in Oldham finds child protection procedures were not followed
Some children have been failed by the agencies that were meant to protect them because child protection procedures had not been properly followed, an independent assurance review into historic child sexual exploitation (CSE) in Oldham has found.
Evidence of poor practice was attributed to a structural flaw the review team found in the multi-agency system [...]
Sixty Second Interview with Chloe Bach
Find out more about our Business Administrator Chloe Bach who has been with WillisPalmer since 2009.
Tea or coffee?
Coffee (oat milk latte)
What 3 things would you put in Room 101?
Migraines, slugs and war
What is your favourite place in the world?
Wherever my family is (but I do love New York)
If you were on death row what [...]
A Mackman Group collaboration - market research by Mackman Research | website design by Mackman