Make an Enquiry
Contact Us

We need to rethink adoption in the social media age, says senior judge

Lord Justice McFarlane suggests too many children are being forcibly adopted and calls for a rethink of UK policy.

Fostering

Too many children are being forcibly adopted against the wishes of their families and prevented from having any contact with their natural parents, a senior judge has suggested.
In the era of social media and with children being removed from problem homes at ever older ages, Lord Justice McFarlane argued, it may no longer be practicable or beneficial to create an “impermeable seal” around an adoptive home.

His comments, although posed in the form of questions, are a challenge to current family justice policies and the dominant presumption, particularly since the Baby P scandal, that more children should be taken out of homes where they may be exposed to violence.

Entitled “Holding the risk: the balance between child protection and the right to family life”, McFarlane’s lecture on Thursday to the family justice council warned that more research was needed to justify the courts’ “highly intrusive, draconian orders” for permanent removal.

Social work practice, spurred on by initiatives from the Tony Blair and coalition governments, “has led to the age at which children may be considered as candidates for adoption regularly encompassing youngsters of the ages of five, six, seven years or older,” the judge explained. Around 20% of adoptions involve children over the age of four.

The older children are removed, he said, the more likely they are to carry the mental scars of their traumatic family life.

“The difficulties facing adopters and adopted children in this regard have been made significantly more difficult ... with the ever-increasing facility to trace and make contact, in an uncontrolled way, with individuals over the internet or via social media,” he added.

This has led to “erosion in the hitherto impermeable seal around the adoptive placement, created by social media”. These changes are, McFarlane said, “sufficient to raise the question of whether our model of adoption continues to be as valuable to each of the individuals concerned as we have hitherto held that it is”.

Britain’s relatively high forcible adoption rate is, the judge noted, “rare across the world”.

He continued: “Magistrates and judges up and down the country on every day of the week are making these highly intrusive draconian orders removing children permanently from their natural families on the basis that to do so is better for the child and that ‘nothing else will do’. But, I ask rhetorically: ‘How do we know this is so?’”

Family judges receive almost no feedback about the success of placements, he said. “The stability and security provided by adoption is said to provide a quality of care which far outstrips any other model that might be available.”
But a future which may include placement breakdown, unstructured and possibly unknown contact with the natural family, upset and confusion, “seems a long cry from the sunny upland of a happy, settled, secure future with a ‘forever family’ which has been the traditional goal of those making adoption orders to date”.

Other problems confronting magistrates and judges in the family courts include care funding restrictions. “In a neglect case,” he said, “where permanent removal is a borderline decision, the question of what resources can be introduced into the home to support the parents may be determinative of the outcome.”
Greater efforts should have been made to promote family drugs and alcohol courts, which offer a way of “breaking the cycle of vulnerability, addiction, confrontation with authority and failure, which is so often the hallmark of families who come back and back before the family courts because, without intervention, they are placing their children at risk.”

The practice of allowing contacts in abusive relationships during private law proceedings – where they have been stopped in child protection proceedings – should also be reviewed, McFarlane suggested.

Better transparency in the family courts would help the public understand the nature of the dilemmas faced by magistrates and judges, he said. “The vacuum created by the lack of sound and accurate information about the system provides a space into which ill-informed, and at times deliberately incorrect, commentary and advice can be introduced.”

Sometimes, he said, such ignorance even encourages “some parents to disengage entirely from the process, refuse to be assessed by independent experts, dispense with the expert lawyers freely provided by the state and, in some extreme cases, flee with their children to Ireland, France or further afield.”

McFarlane, who sat for many years in the family division of the high court, is on the court of appeal. His lecture was in memory of Bridget Lindley of the Family Rights Group who died last year.

Story courtesy of The Guardian

Knowledge & Resources

Keep abreast of the latest news in the children's services sector.

Fears raised over impartiality of Ofsted safeguarding review in schools

13/05/2021

Concerns have been raised about the impartiality of Ofsted’s review into safeguarding in schools and colleges.

The government asked Ofsted to review safeguarding policies in schools and colleges after thousands of children and young people posted anonymously on the Everyone’s Invited website about sexual abuse in schools – including some posts from children as young [...]

Read Full Story

How social workers became the 5th emergency service during lockdown

12/05/2021

Interview with our experienced and highly respected Independent Social Worker Mary Cullen on social workers going above and beyond for vulnerable families during the COVID-19 pandemic

ISW Mary Cullen

Social workers have shown immense resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic and had little choice but to place any health anxieties to one side, don their protective [...]

Read Full Story

Referrals to children’s services down by 11% but case complexity rises

11/05/2021

The number of referrals to children’s services at March 2021 was 11% lower than in previous years, according to official statistics from the Department for Education.

The ‘Vulnerable Children and Young People Survey Summary of returns Waves 1 to 22’ report published by the Department for Education reveals that in Wave 22 - between 8 and [...]

Read Full Story
Children First is an online resource for professionals working with children presented by WillisPalmer, providing you with the latest news, features and interviews.
Subscribe Today
Delivering a diverse, reliable range of services to children and their families across the UK
D1, Parkside, Knowledge Gateway, Nesfield Road, Colchester, Essex CO4 3ZL
Contact Us

A Mackman Group collaboration - market research by Mackman Research | website design by Mackman

closechevron-downbars linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram