Support the #Respect4SocialWork campaign today and celebrate the social work profession.
Make an Enquiry
Contact Us

New civil prevention orders could improve child safeguarding practice

New civil prevention orders could improve child safeguarding practice

Councils and Local Safeguarding Children Boards described as best places to enforce new and improved civil prevention orders.

Councils have been urged to establish new arrangements between family courts and police to better protect children from sexual harm.

In a research article published by respected journal Family Law*, councils and local safeguarding children boards (LSCBs) were described as the most appropriate places to enforce new civil prevention orders (CPOs).

The new CPOs - coming into force as part of the 2014 Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act – were established to improve the protection given to children at risk of sexual harm. They replace the previous orders, which the authors deemed “not fit for purpose”.

Donald Findlater, director of research and development at the Lucy Faithfull Foundation and a co-author of the article, told Community Care that professionals “are not doing enough” to protect children at risk of sexual harm.

Family Law highlighted the opportunity for courts and councils to make better use of CPOs. “Where a court makes findings of sexual abuse, and the nature of the findings made suggests that there is reasonable cause to believe that the individual presents a risk of sexual harm to children, local authorities should routinely refer such cases to the police to prompt applications for CPOs,” it stated.

It continued: “It would fall on the local authority to take the lead in making referrals to the police/NCA [National Crime Agency] for CPOs…”

Professionals need to be aware of the arrangements, Findlater said, so that when findings are made in the family court, and there is evidence to suggest a CPO is needed, this information can find its way to the police. Police can then apply for these CPOs.

“At the moment there are currently thousands of children at risk of sexual harm in the UK, and we aren’t doing enough,” Findlater said. LSCBs should discuss ways of using the new orders, he said – a recommendation also made by his Family Law article.

It stated: “This opportunity to use findings of fact made in public and private law proceedings, to support applications for CPOs in criminal proceedings, could usefully and most appropriately be discussed at LSCBs, the key multi-agency forum for safeguarding policy and practice development”.

It continued: “It is hoped that this discussion informs and prompts family law practitioners to utilise the opportunities offered by [CPOs] to make referrals and facilitate safeguarding and child protection for all children who may be at risk of sexual harm proved in respect of individuals in family law proceedings; over and above the specific children who are the subject of the proceedings.”

Findlater pointed out that judgements in the civil court may protect one child in one circumstance, but can leave an individual who poses a threat to other children free to do so.

An application for CPOs can only be processed through police forces but, in their analysis of what the new laws mean, the writers found that for the referral process to work effectively there needs to be a straightforward referral process, using either existing protocols between councils and police or working together to develop a bespoke referral process.

Findlater said co-operation between professionals when using these orders for child safeguarding is “utterly essential”, adding that he hopes the article will open people’s eyes to the potential of CPOs.

“It was our concern, myself and the other authors, that after family court proceedings there was a lack of a desire to seek out CPOs, that can help with the protection of other children.”

*August [2014] Fam Law 1174.

Story courtesy Community Care

Knowledge & Resources

Keep abreast of the latest news in the children's services sector.

New Deprivation of Liberty court launch for children


A National Deprivation of Liberty Court dealing specifically with applications relating to deprive children of their liberty has been announced by Sir Andrew McFarlane, president of the family division.

The court will deal with applications seeking authorisation to deprive children of their liberty and will be based at the Royal Courts of Justice under the [...]

Read Full Story

Independent review into CSE in Oldham finds child protection procedures were not followed


Some children have been failed by the agencies that were meant to protect them because child protection procedures had not been properly followed, an independent assurance review into historic child sexual exploitation (CSE) in Oldham has found.

Evidence of poor practice was attributed to a structural flaw the review team found in the multi-agency system [...]

Read Full Story

Sixty Second Interview with Chloe Bach


Find out more about our Business Administrator Chloe Bach who has been with WillisPalmer since 2009.

Tea or coffee?

Coffee (oat milk latte)

What 3 things would you put in Room 101?

Migraines, slugs and war

What is your favourite place in the world?

Wherever my family is (but I do love New York)

If you were on death row what [...]

Read Full Story
Children First is an online resource for professionals working with children presented by WillisPalmer, providing you with the latest news, features and interviews.
Subscribe Today
WP Quality Assured

A Mackman Group collaboration - market research by Mackman Research | website design by Mackman

linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram